Table 13 Comparative analysis of CoLog performance across various window sizes and sequence types within the Casper dataset. Bold numbers indicate the outstanding results.
Window size | Sequence type | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Background | Context | |||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
Precision | 99.80 | 99.80 | 99.80 | \(\textbf{100}\) | 99.80 | \(\textbf{100}\) | \(\textbf{100}\) | 99.80 | 99.80 | 99.80 |
Recall | 99.97 | 99.97 | 99.97 | \(\textbf{100}\) | 99.97 | \(\textbf{100}\) | \(\textbf{100}\) | 99.97 | 99.97 | 99.97 |
F1-Score | 99.88 | 99.88 | 99.88 | \(\textbf{100}\) | 99.88 | \(\textbf{100}\) | \(\textbf{100}\) | 99.88 | 99.88 | 99.88 |
Accuracy | 99.95 | 99.95 | 99.95 | \(\textbf{100}\) | 99.95 | \(\textbf{100}\) | \(\textbf{100}\) | 99.95 | 99.95 | 99.95 |
