Table 3 Statistics table for treatment-based alpha diversity in response to time and the canopy treatment for dead wood branches.

From: Correction: Effects of experimental canopy openness on wood-inhabiting fungal fruiting diversity across succession

Tree

q

Predictor

General additive model (GAM)

Linear model

Fixed

Smooth terms

R2

t

edf

F

p

t

p

R2

Beech

0 rare

Intercept

15.58

   

0.75

 − 3.32

 

0.33

Canopy—open vs. closed

 − 0.79

   

 − 0.49

 

Time

 

1.97

28.04

 

3.34

 

Time × Canopy

 

1.51

3.02

0.162

 − 0.87

0.396

1 common

Intercept

11.16

   

0.53

 − 2.51

 

0.20

Canopy—open vs. closed

 − 0.81

   

 − 0.62

 

Time

 

1.92

10.62

 

2.53

 

Time × Canopy

 

3.03

8.23

0.005

 − 1.65

0.119

2 dominant

Intercept

12.74

   

0.63

 − 1.74

 

0.05

Canopy—open vs. closed

 − 0.17

   

 − 0.11

 

Time

 

1.96

17.20

 

1.76

 

Time × Canopy

 

1.00

0.50

0.490

 − 0.43

0.670

Fir

0 rare

Intercept

10.67

   

0.48

 − 2.99

 

0.48

Canopy—open vs. closed

 − 3.27

   

 − 3.27

 

Time

 

1.00

9.06

 

3.01

 

Time × Canopy

 

1.00

1.24

0.283

 − 1.11

0.283

1 common

Intercept

10.70

   

0.42

 − 2.02

 

0.42

Canopy—open vs. closed

 − 3.39

   

 − 3.39

 

Time

 

1.00

4.17

 

2.04

 

Time × Canopy

 

3.26

6.14

0.012

 − 1.03

0.318

2 dominant

Intercept

9.68

   

0.35

 − 2.94

 

0.35

Canopy—open vs. closed

 − 1.86

   

 − 1.86

 

Time

 

1.00

8.79

 

2.96

 

Time × Canopy

 

1.00

0.00

0.959

 − 0.05

0.959

  1. We fit generalized additive models (GAM) and linear models. “Time x Canopy” denotes an interaction term. The alpha level is 0.016 (Bonferroni adjustment due to multiple comparisons). P values for fixed effects are not displayed due to repeated testing. The abbreviations stand for: t = t-value, edf = effective degrees of freedom, F = F-value, p = p-value, R2 = R-squared. Significant values are in [bold].
Back to article page