Table 3 Comparison of the existing method and the proposed method.
Aspects | Existing method in ratio (%) | Proposed method in ratio (%) | Key features |
|---|---|---|---|
Detection accuracy | 85.90 | 95.33 | High accuracy using Random Forest with feature selection and clustering |
False positive rate (FPR) | 25.33 | 15.22 | Reduced false positives through optimised classification techniques |
Computational efficiency | 80.85 | 94.25 | Optimised computational overhead using efficient feature selection |
Recall (detection rate) | 88.92 | 96.09 | High recall ensures better threat detection with minimal false negatives |
Resource Usage Efficiency | 75.85 | 91.45 | Lower processing and memory consumption make it suitable for real-time VANET deployment |