Table 5 Ablation study results across models and Datasets. Initially we tried to imnplemnt on Telco dataset, but this dataset does not perform well on graph based model, so we tried with KKBOX which works extensively for kkbox.
Model | Dataset | Techniques | Test accuracy | Test AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline GNN | Telco | Graph Sage, synthetic graph nodes | 74.0% | 0.82 |
Hybrid GNN | Telco | Feature engineering, SAGE, hybrid (Concat) | 75.5% | 0.83 |
HybridGAT (proposed) | KKBox | GAT, weighted loss, heavy regularization | 88.4% | 0.90 |
Ensemble (GAT + XGBoost) | KKBox | GAT embeddings as features for XGBoost | 89% | 0.90 |
HybridGAT (final model) | KKBox | Large-scale data, feature Eng., GAT, weighted loss | 95.8% | 0.963 |