Table 5 Summary of evaluation results.

From: Association between public space and resident outdoor activity behavior in urban areas surrounding lakes

Category

Weight (%)

Eigenvector

Node item

Weight (%)

Eigenvector

Consistency check

Spatial Accessibility Eval

11.80%

0.59

Transportation Convenience

19.55%

0.115

Passed

Barrier-Free Design

9.23%

0.054

Passed

Travel Time Cost

39.77%

0.235

Passed

Spatial Permeability

15.45%

0.091

Passed

Destination Proximity

15.99%

0.094

Passed

Spatial Comfort Eval

26.18%

1.309

Green Coverage Rate

39.22%

1.026

Passed

Noise Level

7.83%

0.205

Passed

Climatic Conditions

34.48%

0.902

Passed

Microclimate

7.29%

0.191

Passed

Visual Comfort

11.18%

0.293

Passed

Spatial Functionality Eval.

34.61%

1.73

Leisure Facilities

34.79%

1.205

Passed

Sports Facilities

35.21%

1.219

Passed

Social Spaces

17.48%

0.605

Passed

Commercial Facilities

6.93%

0.240

Passed

Cultural Facilities

5.59%

0.194

Passed

Spatial Safety Eval.

9.79%

0.49

Lighting Conditions

39.48%

0.193

Passed

Surveillance Facilities

9.77%

0.048

Passed

Emergency Services

24.79%

0.121

Passed

Water Body Safety Measures

19.93%

0.098

Passed

Public Health Safety

6.03%

0.030

Passed

Spatial Hydrophilicity Eval.

17.63%

0.882

Proportion of Hydrophilic Space

27.53%

0.243

Passed

Accessibility of Hydro. Facil

44.48%

0.392

Passed

Water Body Interactivity

11.79%

0.104

Passed

Water Edge Design

16.20%

0.143

Passed

  1. Results of the AHP evaluation showing calculated weights (%) and eigenvectors for primary indicators (Category) and secondary indicators (Node Item) across the five dimensions. The ‘Weight (%)’ column indicates the relative importance of each indicator. ‘Consistency Check’ confirms that the pairwise comparisons for the secondary indicators within each primary category passed the consistency test (CR < 0.1). Eval Evaluation, Hydro. Facil Hydrophilic Facilities.
Back to article page