Table 3 Genotype-phenotype concordance of antimicrobial resistance genes in Buffalo and broiler chicken isolates.
Antimicrobial resistance gene | Antibiotic disc | resistant buffalo isolates No. 20 | resistant broiler isolates No. 19 | Gene-resistant buffalo isolates | Gene-resistant broiler chickens isolate | buffalo concordance % | broiler chickens’ concordance % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
blaTEM | CFR, CPD, SAM, AX, CB, CFM, TZP, ATM, | 20(100%) 20(100%) 20(100%) 20(100%) 20(100%) 18(90%) 16(80%) 19(95%) (80–100%) | 18(94.74%) 19(100%) 19(100%) 19(100%) 19(100%) 18(94.74%) 16(84.21%) 18(94.74%) (84.21–100%) | (20/20) 100% | (19/19) 100% | 100 | 100 |
blaCTX−M | (7/20) 35% | (3/19) 15.79% | 35 | 15.79 | |||
blaOXA−10 | (2/20) 10% | (6/19) 31.58% | 10 | 31.58 | |||
blaCMY−2 | (11/20) 55% | (9/19) 47.37% | 55 | 47.37 | |||
blaSHV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
blaKPC, blaGES, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM−1, blaOXA−48 | MEM | 19(95%) | 13(68.42%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
sul2 | STX | 20(100%) | 19(100%) | (19/20) 95 | (17/19) 89.47 | 95 | 89.47 |
dfrA1 | STX | 20(100%) | 19(100%) | (20/20) 100 | (19/19) 100 | 100 | 100 |
qnrA | NAL, CIP, LEV | 18(90%) 20(100%) 19(95%) (90–100%) | 19(100%) 17(89.47%) 16(84.21%) (84.21–100%) | (16/20)80 | (16/19)84.21% | 80–88.89.89 | 84.21–100 |
ermB | AZM, CL | 17(85%) 19(95%) (85–95%) | 16(84.21%) 18(94.74%) (84.21–94.74%) | (10/20) 50 | (10/19) 52.63 | 58.82–52.63 | 55.56–62.5 |
tet(M) | MI, DA | 18(90%) 20(100%) | 18(94.74%) 19(100%) | (1/20) 5 | (4/19) 21.05 | 5–5.6.6 | 21.05–22.2 |
