Table 3 Preliminary diagnostic accuracy findings reflecting the methods’ material-specific tendencies.
Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | PPV (95% CI) | NPV (95% CI) | Diagnostic accuracy (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USG | 1 st observer-1st reading | 100% (78.2–100) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% 78.2–100) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (79.4–100) |
1 st observer-2nd reading | 100% (78.2–100) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (78.2–100) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (79.4–100) | |
2nd observer-1st reading | 100% (78.2–100) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (78.2–100) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (79.4–100) | |
2nd observer-2nd reading | 100% (78.2–100) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (78.2–100) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (79.4–100) | |
CBCT | 1 st observer-1st reading | 86.7% (59.5–98.3) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (75.3–100) | 33.3% (0.8–90.6) | 87.5% (61.7–98.4) |
1 st observer-2nd reading | 86.7% (59.5–98.3) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (75.3–100) | 33.3% (0.8–90.6) | 87.5% (61.7–98.4) | |
2nd observer-1st reading | 86.7% (59.5–98.3) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (75.3–100) | 33.3% (0.8–90.6) | 87.5% (61.7–98.4) | |
2nd observer-2nd reading | 86.7% (59.5–98.3) | 100% (2.5–100) | 100% (75.3–100) | 33.3% (0.8–90.6) | 87.5% (61.7–98.4) | |
