Table 1 Energy enhancement schemes: main ideas, advantages, and drawbacks.

From: Hybrid approach for evaluating dynamic scheduling mechanisms in IoT cognitive sensors for enhanced network performance

Scheme

Main idea

Advantages

Drawbacks

TSRA38

Stochastic optimization to minimize energy via joint task scheduling, power, and resource allocation

Balances performance and energy dynamically; minimizes average energy

Needs practical validation in real-world scenarios

EASF39

Adaptive sampling using spatio-temporal correlation to reduce energy

Improves network lifetime; reduces energy up to 47%

Potential data loss; relies on reconstruction accuracy

DSOM40

MILP model using TPN for predictive maintenance in dynamic scheduling

Handles complex operations; provides optimal decision-making

High computational cost; solver dependency

ESS41

Real-time CNN-based sleep control for NB-IoT devices in 5G environments

Extends device lifetime; responsive to data changes

Complex implementation; requires continuous connectivity

TACE42

Energy optimization at Smart Homes

Enhances lifetime; better load and energy enhancement

Only for indoor system, susceptible to noise

EERM43

Energy with QoS with Edge-fog-cloud architecture

Enhances QoS with energy enhancement

Scalabilty issues in increase sensor nodes