Table 1 Energy enhancement schemes: main ideas, advantages, and drawbacks.
Scheme | Main idea | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|---|
TSRA38 | Stochastic optimization to minimize energy via joint task scheduling, power, and resource allocation | Balances performance and energy dynamically; minimizes average energy | Needs practical validation in real-world scenarios |
EASF39 | Adaptive sampling using spatio-temporal correlation to reduce energy | Improves network lifetime; reduces energy up to 47% | Potential data loss; relies on reconstruction accuracy |
DSOM40 | MILP model using TPN for predictive maintenance in dynamic scheduling | Handles complex operations; provides optimal decision-making | High computational cost; solver dependency |
ESS41 | Real-time CNN-based sleep control for NB-IoT devices in 5G environments | Extends device lifetime; responsive to data changes | Complex implementation; requires continuous connectivity |
TACE42 | Energy optimization at Smart Homes | Enhances lifetime; better load and energy enhancement | Only for indoor system, susceptible to noise |
EERM43 | Energy with QoS with Edge-fog-cloud architecture | Enhances QoS with energy enhancement | Scalabilty issues in increase sensor nodes |