Table 3 Schemes with message overhead in adaptive and dynamic scheduling.
Scheme | Main idea | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|---|
CACS44 | Content-based scheduling to reduce idle listening and overhearing | Reduces BER by 22.23%, energy consumption by 20%, and minimizes congestion | Slight increase in delay (0.44s) due to content adaptation overhead |
NPUS-CH45 | Hybrid approach for optimal scheduling, link adaptation, and resource allocation in NB-IoT | Better signal reception, improved energy efficiency and scheduling time | High computational complexity and NP-hard optimization |
ICA-IoT46 | Uses battery level, FSL, hop count for optimized routing and energy savings | 49% energy saving, 86% task time improvement, robust fault tolerance | Needs significant sensor info processing; complexity increases with network size |
APS-IoT47 | Multilevel priority-based queuing with dynamic reordering and emergency handling | 31% improvement in delay for emergency data, 99.9% delivery rate | May deprioritize non-critical data in heavily loaded systems |
PCDE49 | Collision-free scheduling using differential evolution for TSCH networks | Low delay, high PDR, optimized throughput in heterogeneous environments | Complexity in building interference-free transmission graphs |
ASUM50 | Adaptive scheduling technique with MQTT to optimize IoT communication | Memory management with optimized throughput | Slow communication with longer delay |
DMRS48 | Multi-base station with heuristic and greedy strategies | Better Memory management | Energy starved with heavy processing |