Table 9 Utility evaluation and ranking alternatives.

From: Development of ranking alternatives of micro-cup production from directionally rolled copper rods using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy MARCOS method

Alt

Si

Ki-

Ki+

f(K-)

f(K+)

(1-f(K-))/f(K-)

(1-f(K+))/f(K+)

f(K)

Ranking

A1

0.592

1.997

0.592

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.554

17

A2

0.414

1.397

0.414

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.388

20

A3

0.640

2.161

0.640

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.600

13

A4

0.747

2.522

0.747

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.700

5

A5

0.952

3.214

0.952

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.892

1

A6

0.627

2.117

0.627

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.587

15

A7

0.643

2.172

0.643

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.603

12

A8

0.664

2.242

0.664

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.622

11

A9

0.532

1.797

0.532

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.499

19

A10

0.716

2.418

0.716

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.671

8

A11

0.670

2.262

0.670

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.628

9

A12

0.763

2.576

0.763

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.715

4

A13

0.601

2.029

0.601

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.563

16

A14

0.638

2.153

0.638

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.597

14

A15

0.589

1.989

0.589

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.552

18

A16

0.728

2.458

0.728

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.682

6

A17

0.882

2.977

0.882

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.826

2

A18

0.668

2.256

0.668

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.626

10

A19

0.724

2.443

0.724

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.678

7

A20

0.838

2.828

0.838

0.229

0.771

3.375

0.296

0.785

3

AI

1

        

AAI

0.296

        
Back to article page