Table 1 Table of the knowledge gaps we have identified in the seed dispersal process that would allow for a more complete parameterization of a future version of our model, the assumptions we used in our model to circumvent such gaps, and the recommended empirical work needed to truly fill those gaps.

From: Integrating small mammal personality and population abundance into forest regeneration predictions for a managed, mixed species forest in Maine, USA

Knowledge gap

Assumptions of our model

Empirical work needed

Daily movement

Mice moved to 150 random patches within their home range

Radio telemetry tracking of nightly deer mouse movements to determine how much distance they cover, how many foraging bouts they make in a night, and spatial movement patterns

Cache recovery and pilferage

Cache recovery was not considered. Mice pilfered one time in our model, having access to each cache that was not their own

Tracking caches after initial seed dispersal and cache formation to determine cache recovery and pilferage rates through time

Recaching behavior

Mice had the opportunity to recache pilfered seeds one time using the probability of a positive interaction determined using data on deer mouse initial seed interaction and dispersal events

Tracking seeds through multiple cache recovery and/or pilferage events to either spring germination or consumption to determine the rates of recaching versus consumption and final seed fates

Germination and emergence rates of cached seeds

Germination was assumed to be constant at 66%42

Emergence experiments to assess the rates of germination and emergence of seeds handled and cached by deer mice and how those rates vary by cache site