Table 1 The clinical assessments at baseline and after follow-up.

From: Preserved white matter integrity is a promising indicator of cognitive resilience in Parkinson’s disease

Groups/Statistics

Clinical variables

Control at baseline

(n = 121)

PD at baseline

(n = 121)

PD after Follow-up

(n = 121)

P-value

(Control vs. PD at baseline)

P-value

(Baseline vs. Follow-up in PD)

Age, years

59.69 ± 10.76

60.46 ± 9.15

64.31 ± 9.25

P > 0.05

P < 0.0001

Sex (Male/Female)

78/43

79/42

79/42

P > 0.05

-

Education, years

16.07 ± 2.59

15.57 ± 2.77

15.57 ± 2.77

P > 0.05

-

Disease duration, years

-

1.42 ± 1.46

5.52 ± 1.72

-

P < 0.0001

UPDRS-III

0.97 ± 1.86

20.11 ± 9.89

21.87 ± 12.67

P < 0.0001

P > 0.05

Total UPDRS

1.88 ± 2.55

32.57 ± 14.65

40.15 ± 18.85

P < 0.0001

P < 0.0001

LNS

11.33 ± 2.32

10.80 ± 2.73

10.25 ± 2.99

P > 0.05

P < 0.01

SFT

47.00 ± 14.64

50.31 ± 11.46

51.10 ± 12.62

P > 0.05

P > 0.05

SDMT

48.94 ± 11.12

41.71 ± 10.78

40.48 ± 13.01

P < 0.0001

P > 0.05

MoCA

28.16 ± 1.33

27.13 ± 2.46

27.29 ± 2.88

P < 0.0001

P > 0.05

  1. The data were shown as the mean ± SD. Unpaired Student’s t-test or χ2 test (for categorical variable) was used to compare clinical variables between control and PD at baseline. Paired Student’s t-test was utilized to compare clinical variables at baseline and follow-up in PD patients. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: PD, Parkinson’s disease; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; LNS, Letter Number Sequencing Test; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test; SFT, Semantic Fluency Test; UPDRS-III, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.