Table 5 Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis.
From: How sports event scenarios shape urban image and influence audience conative tendency
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Scenario cognition | 4.39 | 1.06 | 1 | ||||||||
1.1 Role participation | 4.20 | 1.46 | 0.736** | 1 | |||||||
1.2 Environmental perception | 4.18 | 1.48 | 0.766** | 0.419** | 1 | ||||||
1.3 Activity evaluation | 4.64 | 1.35 | 0.726** | 0.420** | 0.384** | 1 | |||||
1.4 Cultural Identification | 4.56 | 1.44 | 0.729** | 0.329** | 0.442** | 0.380** | 1 | ||||
2. Emotional Identification with the event | 4.44 | 1.54 | 0.655** | 0.522** | 0.403** | 0.502** | 0.516** | 1 | |||
3. Emotional Identification with the city | 4.22 | 1.49 | 0.671** | 0.500** | 0.549** | 0.444** | 0.489** | 0.581** | 1 | ||
4. Participation motivation | 4.26 | 1.61 | 0.507** | 0.425** | 0.368** | 0.388** | 0.320** | 0.345** | 0.390** | 1 | |
5. Conative tendency | 4.49 | 1.48 | 0.670** | 0.537** | 0.529** | 0.484** | 0.432** | 0.549** | 0.615** | 0.477** | 1 |
