Table 3 Comparison of our model’s denoising performance with a few benchmark models at different datasets such as CBSD68, KODAK24, and McMaster.
KODAK24 | McMaster | CBSD68 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
σ | 15 | 25 | 50 | 15 | 25 | 50 | 15 | 25 | 50 |
CBM3D12 | 34.28 | 31.68 | 28.46 | 34.06 | 31.66 | 28.51 | 33.50 | 30.69 | 27.37 |
DnCNN6 | 34.48 | 32.03 | 28.85 | 33.44 | 31.51 | 28.61 | 33.89 | 31.33 | 27.97 |
FFDNet9 | 34.63 | 32.13 | 28.98 | 34.66 | 32.35 | 29.18 | 33.87 | 31.21 | 27.96 |
ADNet35 | 34.76 | 32.26 | 29.10 | 34.93 | 32.56 | 29.36 | 33.99 | 31.31 | 28.04 |
GradNet37 | 34.85 | 32.35 | 29.23 | 34.81 | 32.45 | 29.39 | 34.07 | 31.39 | 28.12 |
BIRUNet | 33.96 | 32.39 | 29.26 | 33.49 | 32.62 | 29.42 | 32.91 | 31.44 | 28.24 |