Table 3 Packet Delivery Ratio, Throughput, and Latency Performance Comparison.
Parameter/Metric | Method | 200 nodes | 400 nodes | 600 nodes | 800 nodes | 1000 nodes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Packet Delivery Ratio (%) | HBWCO | 72 | 73 | 75 | 70 | 77 |
IBORSDFFNL | 71 | 75 | 74 | 72 | 76 | |
EER-CGHHOA | 70 | 72 | 73 | 71 | 75 | |
Proposed | 80 | 85 | 96 | 79 | 96 | |
Throughput (bps) | HBWCO | 1950 | 2550 | 3150 | 3300 | 3350 |
IBORSDFFNL | 1850 | 2380 | 3050 | 3150 | 3200 | |
EER-CGHHOA | 1750 | 2280 | 2950 | 3000 | 3050 | |
Proposed | 2250 | 2900 | 3550 | 3750 | 3800 | |
Latency (s) | HBWCO | 0.60 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 1.20 | 1.40 |
IBORSDFFNL | 0.57 | 0.78 | 0.97 | 1.18 | 1.38 | |
EER-CGHHOA | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.95 | 1.15 | 1.35 | |
Proposed | 0.45 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.05 | 1.25 |
