Table 1 Themes present in each interview along with interviewee’s age, type of residence, and wildfire hazard lot assessment (WHLA) score.
Interviewee characteristic/Theme | Interviewee ID | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | |
Age (years) | 41–50 | 51–60 | 31–40 | 31–40 | 61–69 | 61–69 | 70+ | 70+ | 51–60 | 61–69 | 61–69 | 61–69 | 61–69 | 41–50 |
Type of residence1 | H | H | R | R | H | H | H | H | H | H | R | H | H | H |
Residence duration (years) | 22 | 5 | < 1 | 6 | 48 | 30 | 26 | 38 | < 1 | 20 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 46 |
Total WHLA score2 | 10 | 4 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 10 |
Perceptions of wildfire vulnerability | ||||||||||||||
The spillover effect | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | N |
Part-time residences | N | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
Some residents mitigate, some do not | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Influence of the regional landscape | ||||||||||||||
Living in proximity to USFS land | N | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | N | N | N | N |
Living ‘in’ the mountains | N | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | N |
Reported (prior) mitigation | ||||||||||||||
Differences by residence type | N | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | N | N |
Aesthetic considerations | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | N | N | N | Y | Y | N | N | N |
Annual vegetation control | N | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
One-time actions | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Seeking advice | Y | N | N | N | N | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | N | N |
Intended (future) mitigations | ||||||||||||||
More of the same | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Aesthetic considerations | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N |
