Table 1 Behavioral statistics.

From: Generation and characterization of a tamoxifen-inducible, Cre driver rat for transgene expression in microglia

 

Main effect - cue

Main effect – group (WT vs. Hem)

Main effect – sex

Main effect – session

2-way interaction (group x cue)

3-way interaction (group x sex x cue)

Preconditioning 1

F(3,75) = 2.98, p = 0.10

F(1,25) = 0.77, p = 0.39

F(1,25) = 0.38, p = 0.54

-

F(3,75) = 0.89, p = 0.36

F(3,75) = 1.02, p = 0.32

Preconditioning 2

F(3,75) = 0.22, p = 0.65

F(1,25) = 0.67, p = 0.42

F(1,25) = 1.52, p = 0.23

-

F(3,75) = 0.40, p = 0.53

F(3,75) = 1.06, p = 0.31

Reward conditioning (B versus D responding)

-

F(1,25) = 0.15, p = 0.71

F(1,25) = 0.41, p = 0.53

F(5,125) = 9.95, p = 0.004

F(5,125) = 0.83, p = 0.37

F(5,125) = 1.27, p = 0.27

Probe test – A versus C, inference

F(1,25) = 4.72, p = 0.04

F(1,25) = 0.87, p = 0.36

F(1,25) = 3.04, p = 0.09

-

F(1,25) = 1.37, p = 0.25

F(1,25) = 0.74, p = 0.40

Probe test – B versus D, reward learning

F(1,25) = 94.37, p < 0.0001

F(1,25) = 0.72, p = 0.40

F(1,25) = 0.01, p = 0.92

-

F(1,25) = 0.01, p = 0.91

F(1,25) = 3.27, p = 0.08

  1. Significant p-values bolded.