Table 7 Comparison of percentage improvement in yield, energy and exergy efficiency, and percentage reduction in CPL and payback period of present study with pertinent literature.

From: Effect of porous material and black coating on solar desalination for sustainable water harvesting: A thermo-exergo-economic and environmental analysis

References

Modification

Improvement (%)

Reduction (%)

\({\dot{m}}_{w}\)

\({\eta }_{en}\)

\({\eta }_{ex}\)

\(CPL\)

\(PP\)

Samuel et al.50

Single slope

+

• spherical ball salt storage

• sponge

54.2

08.3

-

-

33.3

06.7

-

Panchal et al.45

Single slope

+

• inclined fins

• vertical fins

26.8

24.2

-

-

-

-

Kabeel et al.52

Single slope

+

• coated red bricks

60.0

-

-

45.1

43.9

Suraparaju et al.54

Single slope

+

• Ball marbles

21.2

-

-

8.0

12.3

Elmaadawy et al.33

Double slope

+

• Gravels, black wick, dispersed carbon black nanoparticles

68

50.6

146.3

30.7

-

Yarramsetty et al.48

PSS

+

• upward facing clay pots

• downward facing clay pots

47.2

60.0

-

-

-

-

Panchal et al.57

Single slope

+

• evacuated tubes solar collector, perforated fins, and pebbles

144

2.3

142.2

8.9

-

Atteya and Abbas58

Single slope

+

• stepped

• yellow sand

• black sand with reflector

55

71

92

24.4

31.4

41.2

-

-

-

Pandey and Naresh60

PSS

+

• pulsating heat pipe

37.1

25.5

29.3

13.3

7.8

Mahala and Sharma61

PSS

+

• PCM + fins

• Gravels

• PCM + fins + gravels

31.7

37.8

83.9

29.3

37.2

81.1

107

152

273

04.2

25.0

29.2

3.4

24.6

29.1

Present study

PSS

+

Clay pots facing

     

• upward (C-A2)

• upward-downward (C-A3)

• downward (C-A4)

48.1

55.3

64.0

49.8

55.9

65.3

10.2

21.6

36.3

30.9

33.9

37.5

30.9

34.3

37.9

Black coated clay pots facing

     

• upward (C-A5)

• upward-downward (C-A6)

• downward (C-A7)

62.6

78.0

90.8

63.2

18.0

89.2

49.1

78.3

122.6

34.8

40.3

44.5

35.1

40.7

44.7