Table 9 Performance comparison of the proposed framework with other studies.
Study | Primary Task | Dataset | Metric | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sfakianakis et al27. | Segmentation | CAMUS | DSC | 0.96 |
Amer et al30. | Segmentation | CAMUS | DSC | 0.94 |
Wei et al32. | Segmentation | CAMUS | DSC | 0.950 |
Ouyang et al.10 | Segmentation | EchoNet-Dynamic | DSC | 0.925 |
Chen et al44. | Segmentation | EchoNet-Dynamic | DSC | 0.929 |
Duffy et al11. | Keypoint Detection | EchoNet-LVH | MAE | 1.2–1.4 (mm) |
Proposed MTL model | Segmentation | CAMUS | DSC | 0.944 |
Segmentation | EchoNet-Dynamic | DSC | 0.920 | |
Keypoint Detection | EchoNet-LVH | MAE | 1.13 (pixel)* |