Table 3 Comparison of Fγ values with previous studies.
ϕ | r1/B | Keshavarz and Kumar13 | Benmebarek et al31 | Kumar and Chakraborty12 | Tang and Phoon14 | Present Study | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCM | FLAC | LB | UB | LB | LB | UB | ||
20 | 1 | 2.41 | 2.71 | 2.35 | 2.20 | 2.46 | ||
3 | 2.19 | 1.09 | 1.85 | 2.16 | 1.56 | 1.43 | 1.69 | |
5 | 2.41 | 0.6 | 2.32 | 2.6 | 1.41 | 1.32 | 1.55 | |
25 | 1 | 6.07 | 6.78 | - | - | 5.9 | 5.51 | 6.16 |
3 | 5.44 | 2.68 | 4.22 | 4.73 | 3.83 | 3.52 | 4.12 | |
5 | 5.69 | 1.42 | 5.2 | 5.72 | 3.37 | 3.12 | 3.64 | |
30 | 1 | 15.54 | 17.5 | - | - | 15 | 13.99 | 15.68 |
3 | 13.39 | 6.93 | 9.76 | 11.38 | 9.64 | 8.77 | 10.33 | |
5 | 13.5 | 3.43 | 10.12 | 11.84 | 7.99 | 7.39 | 8.60 | |
40 | 1 | 124.1 | 133.7 | - | - | 117 | 109.18 | 124.01 |
3 | 111.38 | 65.9 | 103.46 | 132.1 | 79.5 | 71.12 | 87.01 | |
5 | 107.27 | 26.7 | 80.96 | 114.08 | 53.5 | 48.95 | 58.62 | |