Table 2 Simulation results of 20 groups of samples.

From: Fusion of NSGA-II and Latin hypercube sampling for optimizing node displacement in thin-film IME molding

Group/result

Node displacement

Average

Standard deviation

Volume shrinkage rate %

Average

Standard deviation

001

0.013 ~ 0.816

0.338

0.127

7.386 ~ 1.680

 − 3.347

1.391

002

0.006 ~ 0.526

0.231

0.098

7.538 ~ 1.859

 − 3.586

1.376

003

0.001 ~ 0.491

0.221

0.095

7.237 ~ 1.526

 − 3.295

1.388

004

0.001 ~ 0.590

0.258

0.102

7.685 ~ 2.006

 − 3.697

1.376

005

0.002 ~ 0.498

0.214

0.094

7.667 ~ 2.005

 − 3.762

1.365

006

0.008 ~ 0.963

0.372

0.156

7.783 ~ 2.105

 − 3.735

1.385

007

0.013 ~ 0.653

0.286

0.111

7.815 ~ 2.151

 − 3.815

1.371

008

0.006 ~ 0.481

0.209

0.092

7.381 ~ 1.742

 − 3.543

1.367

009

0.005 ~ 0.481

0.209

0.092

7.330 ~ 1.656

 − 3.468

1.377

010

0.004 ~ 0.491

0.217

0.094

7.303 ~ 1.602

 − 3.375

1.378

011

0.014 ~ 0.362

0.192

0.067

7.062 ~ 0.697

 − 4.083

1.719

012

0.003 ~ 0.500

0.223

0.096

7.555 ~ 1.895

 − 3.620

1.364

013

0.020 ~ 1.003

0.395

0.171

7.696 ~ 2.026

 − 3.645

1.382

014

0.006 ~ 0.484

0.224

0.093

7.514 ~ 1.818

 − 3.626

1.444

015

0.047 ~ 0.477

0.226

0.084

7.525 ~ 1.768

 − 3.510

1.440

016

0.004 ~ 0.475

0.213

0.090

7.464 ~ 1.795

 − 3.659

 − 1.430

017

0.019 ~ 0.524

0.245

0.087

7.322 ~ 1.697

 − 3.448

 − 1.369

018

0.001 ~ 0.431

0.213

0.060

7.159 ~ 1.687

 − 3.667

 − 1.334

019

0.028 ~ 0.779

0.389

0.174

7.482 ~ 1.765

 − 3.730

 − 1.458

020

0.041 ~ 0.821

0.411

0.167

7.511 ~ 1.787

 − 3.742

 − 1.436