Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Hybrid deep learning techniques for adaptive routing and congestion control in urban VANET for wireless mobile networking
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Hybrid deep learning techniques for adaptive routing and congestion control in urban VANET for wireless mobile networking

  • Mohammed Maray1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

The dynamic nature of traffic, high mobility and varying topology are major challenges to Urban Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs), especially in densely populated urban areas. The methods of traditional routing and congestion control are not able to adjust and this leads to increased latency, decreased throughput and frequent breakdowns. In this paper, a new hybrid deep learning architecture that combines Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) to extract spatial features and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to model time is proposed with the aim of offering adaptive routing and other proactive congestion control capabilities in urban VANETs. The model applies the real time traffic information of sensors and vehicular communication systems in urban areas to forecast traffic congestion, model vehicle density and route optimization. In experimental results, the proposed GCN-LSTM model is significantly more efficient in routing and also in predicting results, compared to the baseline models. In particular, it recorded a Mean Absolute Error of 0.02, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.07, routing latency of 38.13 ms and Packet Delivery Ratio of 95, which was much better than GCN-only (MAE: 4.65, PDR: 90.3) and CNN-LSTM (MAE: 0.14, PDR: 88.1). The hybrid model also aids the real-time traffic processing through the edge-cloud cooperation, reducing the inference latency and scaling to city regions. Such methods as geospatial embedding and temporal batching enable the model to represent the intricate flow of traffic in high-resolution. The architecture is also modular and allows simple incorporation of both emergency vehicle prioritization and location-based rerouting and is scalable to operate on resource-constrained edge nodes, meaning it can be used in practice in intelligent city infrastructure. Altogether, the developed model offers a high-performing and scalable adaptive routing and congestion control solution to smart urban transportation systems.

Data availability

The dataset used in this study is the Urban Traffic Flow Dataset, publicly available on Kaggle [40]. It contains timestamped vehicle flow, speed, density, and congestion metrics collected from urban intersections using GPS and roadside sensors. The dataset supports high-resolution spatiotemporal analysis for traffic modelling and routing optimization.

References

  1. Kanellopoulos, D., Sharma, V. K., Panagiotakopoulos, T. & Kameas, A. Networking architectures and protocols for Iot applications in smart cities: recent developments and perspectives. Electronics 12 (11), 2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12112490 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Medeiros, D. D. F., Souza, C. D., Carvalho, F. B. S. D. & Lopes, W. T. A. Energy-saving routing protocols for smart cities. Energies 15, 19, 7382. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197382 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Silva, L. G. et al. Urban advanced mobility dependability: A model-based quantification on vehicular ad hoc networks with virtual machine migration. Sensors. 23 (23), (9485). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23239485 (2023).

  4. Keeler, H., Błaszczyszyn, B. & Cali, E. Connectivity and interference in device-to-device networks in Poisson-Voronoi cities, arXiv: arXiv:2309.02137. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.02137 (2023).

  5. Mazhar, T. et al. Quality of service (QoS) performance analysis in a traffic engineering model for next-generation wireless sensor networks. Symmetry 15 (2), 513. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020513 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, W., Li, X., Hu, H., Wu & Li, J. Spatiotemporal analysis of urban road congestion during and post COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai, China. Transp. Res. Interdisciplinary Perspect. 13, 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100555 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ang, K. L. M., Seng, J. K., Ngharamike, E. & Ijemaru, G. K. Emerging technologies for smart cities’ transportation: geo-information, data analytics and machine learning approaches. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information. 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020085 (2022).

  8. Budda, R., Srinivasan, K., Chauhan, G. S., Jadon, R. & Gollapalli, V. S. T. Cloud-Integrated AI-Enhanced Software IoT Framework for Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring and E (Coli Prediction via Wireless Sensor Networks, 2024).

  9. Prajapati, M., Upadhyay, A. K., Patil, D. H. & Dongradive, D. J. A review of deep reinforcement learning for traffic signal control. International J. Multidisciplinary Research.

  10. Deshpande, N., Vaufreydaz, D. & Spalanzani, A. Behavioral decision-making for urban autonomous driving in the presence of pedestrians using Deep Recurrent Q-Network, in 16th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), Shenzhen, China: IEEE, 428–433. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARCV50220.2020.9305435 (2020).

  11. Fuad, M. R. T. et al. Adaptive deep q-network algorithm with exponential reward mechanism for traffic control in urban intersection networks. Sustainability https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114590 (2022). ,14,21,14590.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, X. Y., Zhu, M., Borst, S. & Walid, A. Deep reinforcement learning for traffic light control in intelligent transportation systems, arXiv: arXiv:2302.03669. (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03669

  13. Paranjothi, A., Khan, M. S. & Zeadally, S. Survey on congestion detection and control in connected vehicles. Ad Hoc Netw. 108,102277 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102277 (2020).

  14. Giripunje, L. M., Vidyarthi, A. & Shandilya, S. K. Adaptive congestion prediction in vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANET) using Type-2 fuzzy model to Establish reliable routes, In Review. (2021). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-458059/v1

  15. Gao, X., Haworth, J., Zhuang, D., Chen, H. & Jiang, X. Uncertainty quantification in the road-level traffic risk prediction by spatial-temporal zero-inflated negative binomial graph neural network(STZINB-GNN), arXiv: arXiv:2307.13816. (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.13816

  16. Farber, S. & Grandez, M. Transit accessibility, land development and socioeconomic priority: A typology of planned station catchment areas in the greater Toronto and Hamilton area. JTLU 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.980 (2017).

  17. Al, E. & Jyothi, E. V. N. A graph neural network-based traffic flow prediction system with enhanced accuracy and urban efficiency, jes, 19, 4, 336–349, (2024). https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.642

  18. Mohammed, M. A. A comprehensive survey on congestion control techniques and the research challenges on VANET. Zanco J. Pure Appl. Sci. 34 (5), 50–78 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kothai, G. et al. A new hybrid deep learning algorithm for prediction of wide traffic congestion in smart cities. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 1, 5583874. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5583874 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mohanty, A. et al. Identification and evaluation of the effective criteria for detection of congestion in a smart City. IET Commun. 16, 5, 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1049/cmu2.12344 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vallati, M. & Chrpa, L. Reducing traffic congestion in urban areas via real-time re-routing: a simulation study, in AI 2020: Advances in Artificial Intelligence,12576, M. Gallagher, N. Moustafa, and E. Lakshika, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science,12576. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 69–81. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64984-5_6

  22. Chin, Y., Bolong, N., Yang, S. S. & Teo, K. T. K. Q-Learning based traffic optimization in management of signal timing plan. Int. J. Simulation: Syst. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.12.03.05 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anjaneyulu, M. & Kubendiran, M. Short-term traffic congestion prediction using hybrid deep learning technique. Sustainability 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010074 (2022).

  24. Zhao, X., Hu, L., Wang, X. & Wu, J. Study on identification and prevention of traffic congestion zones considering Resilience-Vulnerability of urban transportation systems. Sustainability 14, 24, (16907). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416907 (2022).

  25. Zhong, W. & Du, L. Predicting traffic casualties using support vector machines with heuristic algorithms: a study based on collision data of urban roads. Sustainability 15 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042944 (2023).

  26. Gao, F., Yang, B., Chen, C., Guan, X. & Zhang, Y. Distributed urban freeway traffic optimization considering congestion propagation, arXiv: arXiv:2106.06201. (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.06201

  27. Ghaffari, E., Rahmani, A. M., Saberikamarposhti, M. & Sahafi, A. An optimal path-finding algorithm in smart cities by considering traffic congestion and air pollution. IEEE Access. 10, 55126–55135. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3174598 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zang,Jiao, J., Liu, S., Zhang, X., Song, G. & Yu, L. Identifying traffic congestion patterns of urban road network based on traffic performance index. Sustainability 15 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020948 (2023).

  29. Urquiza Aguiar, L. F. & Aguilar Igartua, M. Contribution to the design of VANET routing protocols for realistic urban environments, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, (2016). https://doi.org/10.5821/dissertation-2117-98117

  30. Dui, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S. & Zhang, Y. A. Recovery model and maintenance optimization for urban road networks with congestion, Mathematics, 11,9, (2023), (2004). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11092004

  31. Xing, X., Li, X. & Zhai, Y. GRU-CNN neural network method for regional traffic congestion prediction serving traffic diversion demand. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8164105 (2022).

  32. Zhai, Y., Wan, Y. & Wang, X. Optimization of traffic congestion management in smart cities under bidirectional long and short-term memory model. J. Adv. Transp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3305400 (2022).

  33. Abdullah, S. M. et al. Optimizing traffic flow in smart cities: soft gru-based recurrent neural networks for enhanced congestion prediction using deep learning. Sustainability 15, 7, 5949. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075949 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tedjopurnomo, D. A., Choudhury, F. M. & Qin, A. K. TrafFormer: A transformer model for predicting long-term traffic, arXiv: arXiv:2302.12388. (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.12388

  35. Munuhwa, S. & Govere, E. Alleviating urban traffic congestion: case of Gaborone City. JESD https://doi.org/10.7176/JESD/11-8-06 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rui, Y., Lu, W., Yi, Z., Wu, R. & Ran, B. A novel hybrid model for predicting traffic flow via improved ensemble learning combined with deep belief networks. Math. Probl. Eng. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7328056 (2021).

  37. Kempinska, K. & Murcio, R. Modelling urban networks using variational autoencoders. Appl. Netw. Sci. 4 (1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0234-0 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yan, L. & Wang, J. Deep reinforcement learning for ecological and distributed urban traffic signal control with multi-agent equilibrium decision making. Electronics https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13101910 (2024). 13, 10, 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, W. Countermeasures for urban traffic congestion in China from the perspective of system dynamics. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3509902 (2022).

  40. Mahmoud, A. & Mohammed, A. Leveraging hybrid deep learning models for enhanced multivariate time series forecasting. Neural Process. Lett. 56 (5), 223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-024-11656-3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nazirova, S. et al. Secure data transmission in VANETs for philological field expeditions and mobile Language labs. JISIS 15, 2, 892–905. https://doi.org/10.58346/JISIS.2025.I2.059 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wan, Y. Delay sensitive music transmission architecture for 5G VANET: integrated network slicing and predictive beamforming. Trans. Emerg. Telecommunications Technol. 36, 10, e70246. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.70246 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shi, X. Optimization of high-definition music streaming VANET broadcast protocol for QoS. Trans. Emerg. Telecommunications Technol. 36, 9e70248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.70248 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ziya Urban Traffic Flow Dataset. Accessed: Aug. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ziya07/urban-traffic-flow-dataset

  45. Karim, A. A. & Nower, N. Long-term traffic prediction based on stacked GCN model. Knowl. Eng. Data Sci. 6 https://doi.org/10.17977/um018v6i12023p92-102 (2023).

  46. Chu, K. F., Lam, A. Y. S., Tsoi, K. H., Huang, Z. & Loo, B. Y. Deep encoder cross network for estimated time of arrival. IEEE Access. 11, 76095–76107. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3294345 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhao, J. et al. Efficient and privacy-preserving federated learning against poisoning adversaries. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 17, 5, 2320–2333. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2024.3377931 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Paul, S. Investigating federated learning implementation challenges in 6G Network, in Fourth International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT), Bhilai, India: IEEE, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAECT60202.2024.10469650 (2024).

  49. Pei, J., Liu, W., Li, J., Wang, L. & Liu, C. A review of federated learning methods in heterogeneous scenarios. IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron. 70, 3, 5983–5999. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2024.3385440 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Grantee is required to clearly acknowledge NCA and the provided grant in the “Funding Acknowledgment” section of any publication or patent resulting from the grant, using the following statement: “This research is supported by a grant (No. CRPG-25-3053) under the Cybersecurity Research and Innovation Pioneers Initiative, provided by the National Cybersecurity Authority (NCA) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics and Computer Systems, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammed Maray

  2. Central Labs, King Khalid University, P.O. Box 960, AlQura’a, Abha, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammed Maray

Authors
  1. Mohammed Maray
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All contributions done by Dr. Maray.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Maray.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maray, M. Hybrid deep learning techniques for adaptive routing and congestion control in urban VANET for wireless mobile networking. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33193-2

Download citation

  • Received: 14 August 2025

  • Accepted: 16 December 2025

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33193-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • VANET
  • Adaptive routing
  • Congestion control
  • GCN
  • LSTM
  • Urban mobility
  • Wireless networking
  • Deep learning and traffic forecasting
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics