Table 5 This table presents a comparison of different landslide susceptibility models, highlighting the approach, VHLS percentage focus, VHLS area, strengths, and limitations of each model.

From: National-scale landslide susceptibility and risk mapping of India using a hybrid data-driven approach

Model

Approach

VHLS % Focus

VHLS Area

Strengths

Limitations

AHP

Expert-driven weighting

Sikkim (54.9%), followed by Uttarakhand (44.1%) and Himachal Pradesh (40.5%)

Arunachal Pradesh (32,942 sq. km)

Intuitive, easy to implement

Subjective weight assignments

Yc

Data-driven statistical model

Nagaland (55%), Mizoram (53.1%), and Arunachal Pradesh (52.1%)

Arunachal Pradesh (44,392 sq. km)

Reflects real landslide distribution

Completely rely on the landslide database

FR

Nagaland (60.8%), Mizoram (57.9%), and Uttarakhand (51.2%)

Arunachal Pradesh (43,860 sq. km)

Back to article page