Table 2 Comparison study of the developed sensor for DOX.
Technique | Linear range (µM) | Limit of detection (µM) | Sample matrix | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FL using carbon quantum dots | 0–50 | 2420 | Pharmaceutical waste | |
EC using poly(dipicrylamine) | 5-200 | 0.15 & 0.13 | Pharmaceutical brands | |
FL and colorimetric using N, P co-doped carbon dots | 3.348-109.308 1.609–31.448 | 1.5273 0.0295 | Water | |
FL colorimetric hydrogel sensor | 0–28 | 0.0537 | Lake water, meat, milk | |
Ratiometric fluorescence | 0.25–100 | 0.025 | Milk, Fish | |
FL probe | 0–50 | 0.116 | Fish samples, pharmaceutical wastewater, blood samples | |
MIPs electrochemical | 0.05–0.5 | 0.013 | Human serum | |
Fluorescent aptasensor | 0.13-100 | 0.114 | Wastewater | This work |