Table 5 Test results of five models in different scenarios.

From: Signal transmission optimization of intelligent metasurface-assisted communication system based on improved DQNN

Project

BER (%)

Throughput (Mbps)

EE (bit/Hz/J)

AD (ms)

5G base station networks in densely populated urban areas

Model 1

0.12±0.04@#$*

987.62±10.34@#$*

4.32±1.04@#$*

3.20±1.36@#$*

Model 2

0.30±0.02

768.94±11.05

3.00±1.36

4.58±1.15

Model 3

0.22±0.03

821.35±10.88

3.28±1.05

4.23±1.04

Model 4

0.35±0.04

700.42±11.01

2.57±0.97

4.92±1.46

Model 5

0.38±0.03

674.13±10.34

2.24±1.28

5.34±1.24

5G private network for industrial parks

Model 1

0.09±0.05@#$*

1024.35±11.25@#$*

4.58±1.06@#$*

2.83±1.36@#$*

Model 2

0.28±0.04

723.84±12.86

2.97±1.11

4.69±1.08

Model 3

0.25±0.03

843.28±11.14

3.20±1.08

4.52±1.06

Model 4

0.36±0.04

770.49±11.06

2.55±1.26

4.99±1.23

Model 5

0.39±0.04

692.36±10.84

2.20±1.00

5.30±0.90

  1. Note: In Table 5, @ indicates a significant difference between the results of Model 1 and Model 2 (p<0.05); # Indicates that there is a significant difference between the results of Model 1 and Model 3 (p<0.05); $indicates that there is a significant difference between the results of Model 1 and Model 4 (p<0.05); * Indicates a significant difference between the results of Model 1 and Model 5 (p<0.05)