Table 5 ANOVA analysis for the cybershake workflow.
From: Efficient workflow scheduling in fog-cloud collaboration using a hybrid IPSO-GWO algorithm
Task size | Metric | Mean value | F-statistic | P-value | Significant | Best algorithm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 | Makespan | 60,529 | 0.43928 | 0.77953 | No | GWO |
100 | Energy consumption | 2438 | 1.3375 | 0.27078 | No | GWO |
100 | Cost | 16,148 | 1.8494 | 0.13601 | No | IPSO-GWO |
500 | Makespan | 68,202 | 2.202 | 0.083904 | No | GWO |
500 | Energy consumption | 4601.4 | 4.6731 | 0.0030643 | Yes | GWO |
500 | Cost | 38,266 | 1.5481 | 0.2046 | No | IPSO-GWO |
1000 | Makespan | 1.0152eâ+â05 | 2.1609 | 0.088771 | No | GWO |
1000 | Energy consumption | 8337.9 | 3.7288 | 0.010527 | Yes | GWO |
1000 | Cost | 77,035 | 2.3889 | 0.064892 | No | IPSO-GWO |
