Table 8 Wilcoxon rank-sum test p-values comparing SFOA-Secant with other optimization algorithms for SDM, DDM, TDM, and PVM models.
SFOA-Secant vs. | SDM | DDM | TDM | PVM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFOA | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.82 \times 10^{-10}\) | + | \(5.07 \times 10^{-10}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
ECO | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(5.49 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
HO | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.69 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(4.50 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
OOA | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
ZOA | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.69 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(4.98 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
ECO-Secant | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.47 \times 10^{-10}\) | + | \(9.92 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
HO-Secant | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(6.70 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(8.15 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
OOA-Secant | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
ZOA-Secant | \(3.0199 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(1.09 \times 10^{-10}\) | + | \(5.49 \times 10^{-11}\) | + | \(3.02 \times 10^{-11}\) | + |
