Table 7 Comparison of electrical performance metrics of the TFSCs in this study with those reported in literature.
From: Design and optimization of CIGS-based solar cell with surface dielectric nanostructures arrangement
Ref. | \(\:{\mathbf{J}}_{\mathbf{s}\mathbf{c}}\) (mA/cm2 ) | \(\:{\mathbf{V}}_{\mathbf{O}\mathbf{C}}\:\left(\mathbf{V}\right)\) | η (%) | FF (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
201653 | 28.6 | -- | -- | -- |
201654 | 22.8 | 0.65 | 12.2 | 83 |
201855 | 29.09 | 0.95 | 23.01 | 83.47 |
201823 | 24 | 1 | 14.7 | 67 |
20202 | 23.98 | 0.61 | 12.3 | 84 |
202024 | 30.91 | 0.623 | 15.9 | 83.01 |
20216 | 15.26 | -- | -- | -- |
202225 | 19.34 | -- | -- | -- |
202321 | 9.8 | -- | -- | -- |
202428 | 23.22 | 0.749 | 13.62 | 78.29 |
202427 | 31.996 | 1.053 | 29.634 | 87.89 |
202556 | 35.1 | 0.81 | -- | -- |
202557 | 30.71 | -- | 7.62 | -- |
Proposed TFSC with spherical nano-particles | 35.27 | 0.61 | 16.18 | 76.1 |
Proposed TFSC with cylindrical nano-particles | 36.20 | 0.61 | 16.70 | 76.2 |
Proposed TFSC with cubic nano-particles | 37.841 | 0.62 | 17.62 | 76.3 |