Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Effect of weight-based fertigation on physiology, gas exchange and yield of soilless cucumber and capsicum
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 January 2026

Effect of weight-based fertigation on physiology, gas exchange and yield of soilless cucumber and capsicum

  • Ravindra D. Randhe1,3,
  • Murtaza Hasan1,
  • D. K. Singh1,
  • S. Naresh Kumar1,
  • Pramod Kumar1,
  • Wasi Alam2,
  • Rakesh Pandey1,
  • Mukesh Kumar3 &
  • …
  • Abhishek M. Waghaye3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 803 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Physiology
  • Plant sciences

Abstract

Effective fertigation management through automation is crucial for enhancing yield and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) under soilless cultivation. This study evaluated weight-based fertigation strategies for automated fertigation control in cucumber and capsicum crops grown in coco-peat grow bags under semi-controlled greenhouse conditions. Four fertigation strategies were investigated based on weight change criteria: T1- 100% nutrient solution (NS) replenished to compensate for 200 g weight loss due to crop evapotranspiration; T2, T3, and T4 received 10%, 20%, and 30% less NS than T1, respectively. Growth parameters (plant height, leaf area, specific leaf area, leaf weight ratio, relative and absolute growth rates), and gas exchange parameters (photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and water use efficiency) were analysed. Results showed that T1 fertigation strategy significantly enhanced crop growth, photosynthetic activity, and yield. The highest yields were recorded for cucumber (101.20 t ha⁻¹) and for colored capsicum (61.13 t ha⁻¹) in T1 treatment. Reduced nutrient solutions treatments led to decreased yields but increased IWUE. Thus, the findings suggested that applying a higher level of the nutrient solution against weight loss offers the most effective approach. This weight-based fertigation approach may be prioritised for automated fertigation application and controls in coco-peat grow bag cultivation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Comparison of the growth, fruit quality and physiological characteristics of cucumber fertigated by three different nutrient solutions in soil culture and soilless culture systems

Article Open access 02 January 2025

Effects of irrigation scheduling on the yield and irrigation water productivity of cucumber in coconut coir culture

Article Open access 05 February 2024

UAV-based individual Chinese cabbage weight prediction using multi-temporal data

Article Open access 17 November 2023

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Reddy, P. P. Sustainable Crop Protection Under Protected Cultivation (Springer, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-952-3

  2. Hasan, M. et al. Hydroponics technology for horticultural crops. Tech. Bull. TB-ICN 188/ (2018). (2018).

  3. Grunert, O. et al. Growing media constituents determine the microbial nitrogen conversions in organic growing media for horticulture. Microb. Biotechnol. 9, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12354 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anonymous Report of the Working Group on Horticulture Development for the Tenth Five Year Plan (Planning Commission, 2001).

  5. Arenas, M., Vavrina, C. S., Cornell, J. A., Hanlon, E. A. & Hochmuth, G. J. Coir as an alternative to peat in media for tomato transplant production. HortScience 37, 309–312 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett, G. E., Alexander, P. D., Robinson, J. S. & Bragg, N. C. Achieving environmentally sustainable growing media for soilless plant cultivation systems – a review. Sci. Hortic. 212, 220–234 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mukherjee, P. K., Nema, N. K., Maity, N. & Sarkar, B. K. Phytochemical and therapeutic potential of cucumber. Fitoterapia 84, 227–236 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mazahreh, N., Nejatian, A. & Mousa, M. Effect of different growing medias on cucumber production and water productivity in soilless culture under UAE conditions. Merit Res. J. Agric. Sci. Soil. Sci. 3, 131–138 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singh, M. C., Singh, K. G., Singh, J. P. & Mahal, A. K. Performance of soilless cucumbers in relation to differential fertigation under naturally ventilated greenhouse conditions. J. Plant. Nutr. 42, 1316–1332 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. ICAR–Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR). Protected Cultivation of capsicum. ICAR-IIHR Technical Bulletin No. 22 (revised edition) (Bengaluru, 2011).

  11. Ngouajio, M., Wang, G. & Goldy, R. G. Timing of drip irrigation initiation affects irrigation water use efficiency and yield of bell pepper under plastic mulch. HortTechnology 18, 397–402 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, A. K., Singh, B. & Gupta, R. Performance of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) varieties and economics under protected and open field conditions in Uttarakhand. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 81, 973–975 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raza, A. et al. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants 8, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8020034 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neto, A. J. S. & Zolnier, S. De Carvalho Lopes, D. Development and evaluation of an automated system for fertigation control in soilless tomato production. Comput. Electron. Agric. 103, 17–25 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A’fifah, A. R. et al. Optimum fertigation requirement and crop coefficients of Chilli (Capsicum annuum) grown in soilless medium in the tropic climate. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 17, 80–88 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kabir, M. Y., Nambeesan, S. U., Bautista, J. & Díaz-Pérez, J. C. Effect of irrigation level on plant growth, physiology and fruit yield and quality in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L). Sci. Hortic. 281, 109902 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Choi, Y. B. & Shin, J. H. Analysis of the changes in medium moisture content according to a crop irrigation strategy and the medium properties for precise moisture content control in rock wool. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 60, 337–343 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Medrano, E., Lorenzo, P., Sanchez-Guerrero, M. C. & Montero, J. I. Evaluation and modelling of greenhouse cucumber-crop transpiration under high and low radiation conditions. Sci. Hortic. 105, 163–175 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, W. T., Yeh, Y. H. F., Liu, T. Y. & Lin, T. T. An automated and continuous plant weight measurement system for plant factory. Front. Plant. Sci. 7, 392 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ding, X. et al. Model simulation of cucumber yield and microclimate analysis in a semi-closed greenhouse in China. HortScience 54, 547–554 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ding, X. et al. Zero discharge of nutrient solution to the environment in a soilless greenhouse cucumber production system. Plants 11, 2252 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Othman, Y. et al. Soilless culture: management of growing substrate, water, nutrient, salinity, microorganism and product quality. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 28, 3249–3260 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mandal, U. K., Singh, G., Victor, U. S. & Sharma, K. L. Green manuring: its effect on soil properties and crop growth under rice–wheat cropping system. Eur. J. Agron. 19, 225–237 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sonneveld, C. & Voogt, W. Plant Nutrition of Greenhouse Crops (Springer, 2009).

  25. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. & Smith, M. Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements (FAO, 1998). FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56.

  26. Sarker, B. C. & Hara, M. Quantitative analysis of relative growth rate based on leaf growth characteristics and evapotranspiration of eggplant and tomato under periodic water deficit at reproductive stage. J. Appl. Hortic. 6, 76–81 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vile, D. et al. Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves. Ann. Bot. 96, 1129–1136 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ghehsareh, A. M., Khosravan, S. & Shahabi, A. A. The effect of different nutrient solutions on some growth indices of greenhouse cucumber in soilless culture. J. Plant. Breed. Crop Sci. 3, 321–326 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sonnenberg, D., Ndakidemi, P. A., Okem, A. & Laubscher, C. Effects of drip irrigation on growth, physiological parameters, and yield in hydroponically cultivated Cucumis sativus. HortScience 51, 1412–1416 (2016).

  30. Singh, M. C., Singh, K. G. & Singh, J. P. Yield of soilless cucumbers planted under partially controlled greenhouse environment in relation to deficit fertigation. Indian J. Hortic. 75, 259–264 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jovicich, E., Cantliffe, D. J., Stoffella, P. J. & Vansickle, J. J. Reduced fertigation of soilless greenhouse peppers improves fruit yield and quality. ActaHortic. 609, 193–196 (2003).

  32. Sabli, M. Z. Fertigation of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in a soil-less greenhouse system: effects of fertilizer formulation and irrigation frequency. PhD thesis, Newcastle Univ., UK (2012).

  33. Biwalkar, N. et al. Response of coloured sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum) to fertigation and irrigation levels under naturally ventilated greenhouse. Agric. Res. J. 52, 19–25 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ferrara, A., Lovelli, S., Di Tommaso, T. & Perniola, M. Flowering, growth and fruit setting in greenhouse bell pepper under water stress. J. Agron. 10, 12–19 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ahmed, A. F., Yu, H., Yang, X. & Jiang, W. Deficit irrigation affects growth, yield, vitamin C content, and irrigation water use efficiency of hot pepper grown in soilless culture. HortScience 49, 722–728 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Aminifard, M. H., Aroiee, H., Ameri, A. & Fatemi, H. Effect of plant density and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7, 859–866 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silber, A. et al. High fertigation frequency: the effects on uptake of nutrients, water and plant growth. Plant. Soil. 253, 467–477 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sobczak, A., Pióro-Jabrucka, E., Gajc-Wolska, J. & Kowalczyk, K. Effect of Salicylic acid and calcium on growth, yield, and fruit quality of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) grown hydroponically. Agronomy 14, 329 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely acknowledge ICAR-IARI (Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi) and ICAR-CIAE (Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal) for providing financial and technical support and laboratory facilities to carry out the study. The support and guidance provided by the scientists and staff of the Centre for Protected Cultivation Technology (CPCT), Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi is greatly appreciated. Due to their collective efforts and support, this research project was completed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 110012, India

    Ravindra D. Randhe, Murtaza Hasan, D. K. Singh, S. Naresh Kumar, Pramod Kumar & Rakesh Pandey

  2. ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Wasi Alam

  3. ICAR-Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal, 462038, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Ravindra D. Randhe, Mukesh Kumar & Abhishek M. Waghaye

Authors
  1. Ravindra D. Randhe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Murtaza Hasan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. K. Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Naresh Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pramod Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wasi Alam
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rakesh Pandey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mukesh Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Abhishek M. Waghaye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization RDR, MH, DKS. Methodology RDR, MH, DKS, SNK. Formal analysis WA, RDR, PK. Investigation RDR, MH, SNK, RP, AMW. Data Curation RDR, MH, WA, SNK, PK. Writing - Original Draft RDR, MH, SNK. Writing - Review & Editing RDR, MH, DKS, SNK, RP, AMW, MK. Supervision MH, DKS, SNK. Project administration RDR, MH, DKS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravindra D. Randhe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Randhe, R.D., Hasan, M., Singh, D.K. et al. Effect of weight-based fertigation on physiology, gas exchange and yield of soilless cucumber and capsicum. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34858-8

Download citation

  • Received: 29 September 2025

  • Accepted: 31 December 2025

  • Published: 14 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34858-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Soilless cultivation
  • Capsicum
  • Cucumber
  • Weight-based fertigation
  • Coco-peat
  • Fertigation strategy
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing