Table 2 Univariate and stepwise discriminant function analysis for hyoid bones.

From: Hyoid bone-based sex discrimination among Egyptians using a multidetector computed tomography: discriminant function analysis, meta-analysis, and artificial intelligence-assisted study

Equation

Group centroid

Eigenvalue

Wilks’ λ

Canonical correlation

Total function accuracy

Accuracy of sexes

Male

Female

Male

Female

N

%

N

%

N

%

Univariate analysis

 0.443(AA′) − 9.775

0.998

− 0.998

1.002

0.499

0.707

255

85

120

80

135

90

 0.656 (BB′) − 6.943

0.483

− 0.483

0.235

0.810

0.436

215

71.7

104

69

111

74

 0.803 (CC′) − 5.132

0.476

− 0.476

0.228

0.814

0.431

197

65.7

91

60.7

106

70.7

 0.235 (DD′) − 6.006

0.499

− 0.499

0.250

0.800

0.447

212

70.7

113

75.3

99

66

 0.245 (EE′) − 6.155

0.469

− 0.469

0.222

0.818

0.426

218

72.7

110

73.3

108

72

 0.430 (FF′) − 10.474

0.857

− 0.857

0.740

0.575

0.652

248

82.7

117

78

131

87.3

 0.294 (GG′) − 9.689

0.707

− 0.707

0.503

0.665

0.579

225

75

111

74

114

76

 0.211 (D′E′) − 7.928

0.445

− 0.445

0.200

0.834

0.408

207

69

105

70

102

68

 0.215 (HL) − 6.952

0.662

− 0.662

0.439

0.695

0.552

226

75.3

115

76.7

111

74

 0.227 (HW) − 9.192

0.517

− 0.517

0.269

0.788

0.460

217

72.3

110

73.3

107

71.3

Stepwise analysis

 0.236(AA′) + 0.167(BB′) + 0.158(FF′) + 0.077(HL) − 13.310

1.206

− 1.206

1.464

0.406

0.771

263

87.7

128

85.3

135

90