Table 3 The impact of uncertainty budget on the ESF location-allocation scheme.
\(\Gamma\) | CPU time(s) | Iter. | Gap | Facility location strategy | Demand satisfaction rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.10 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,2,3,5,6,7] | 6 | 99.99% |
2 | 3.09 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,2,4,6,7,9] | 6 | 99.58% |
3 | 3.12 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,3,4,5,8,9,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
4 | 3.09 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,3,4,5,8,9,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
5 | 3.12 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,3,4,5,8,9,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
6 | 3.12 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,3,4,5,8,9,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
7 | 3.11 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,3,4,5,8,9,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
8 | 3.21 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,3,4,5,7,8,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
9 | 3.18 | 2 | 0.00 | [3,4,6,7,8,9,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
10 | 3.11 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,3,4,6,7,9,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
11 | 3.42 | 2 | 0.00 | [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] | 7 | 100.00% |
12 | 3.15 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,2,3,4,6,7,10] | 7 | 100.00% |
13 | 3.16 | 2 | 0.00 | [1,2,3,4,6,7,9] | 7 | 99.67% |
