Table 6 Comparison results of number scheduling scenario 1.
Operational mode | Comparative indicator | MSPSGA | AGPSA | GPSA | GA | SAA | NSGAIII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Optimal number | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
Total time (s) | 26.71 | 37.04 | 37.88 | 39.84 | 20.43 | 27.15 | |
Fitness value | 3.86 | 1.87 | 1.90 | 1.89 | 2.11 | 1.58 | |
Average power (W) | 2.17 | 13 | 14.66 | 7.6 | 15.0 | 7.0 | |
Max. power (W) | 4.53 | 16 | 20 | 12 | 20.0 | 12.0 | |
Operational time (h) | 20.87 | 11.4 | 9.5 | 14.25 | 9.5 | 14.25 | |
Model 2 | Optimal number | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
Total time (s) | 16.92 | 37.49 | 38.39 | 38.88 | 17.06 | 26.55 | |
Fitness value | 14.56 | 14.28 | 11.58 | 12.07 | 10.68 | 9.72 | |
Average power (W) | 3.3 | 16.0 | 6.0 | 16.0 | 9.5 | 12.0 | |
Max. power (W) | 4.0 | 20.0 | 16.0 | 16.0 | 16.0 | 16.0 | |
Operational time (h) | 28.5 | 9.5 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 11.4 | |
Model 3 | Optimal number | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Total time (s) | 16.99 | 39.9 | 37.97 | 38.78 | 16.53 | 24.75 | |
Fitness value | 17.12 | 11.39 | 13.51 | 13.29 | 12.93 | 12.65 | |
Average power (W) | 2.0 | 7.6 | 17.0 | 11.36 | 13.5 | 17.0 | |
Max. power (W) | 2.0 | 12.0 | 20.0 | 12.93 | 20.0 | 20.0 | |
Operational time (h) | 38 | 14.25 | 9.5 | 13.46 | 9.5 | 9.5 |
