Table 12 Comprehensive weight and ranking of art intervention in public spaces on ancient villages.
First level of demand (A) | Second level of demand (B) | Weight value | Third level of demand (C) | Weight at this level | Comprehensive weight | Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive Evaluation of Art Intervention in Public Spaces on Ancient Villages (A) | Village Transformation (B1) | 0.242 | Spatial Coherence (C1) | 0.223 | 0.054 | 10 |
Infrastructure Integrity (C2) | 0.271 | 0.066 | 7 | |||
Spatial Accessibility (C3) | 0.321 | 0.078 | 5 | |||
Artistic and Cultural Atmosphere (C4) | 0.185 | 0.045 | 14 | |||
Environmental Appearance (B2) | 0.307 | Integration with Original Landscape (C5) | 0.282 | 0.087 | 2 | |
Compliance with Village Cultural Aesthetics (C6) | 0.240 | 0.074 | 6 | |||
Environmental Art Aesthetics (C7) | 0.178 | 0.055 | 9 | |||
Environmental Sanitation Quality (C8) | 0.280 | 0.086 | 3 | |||
Economic Benefits (B3) | 0.181 | Renovation Costs (C9) | 0.263 | 0.047 | 13 | |
Maintenance Costs (C10) | 0.275 | 0.050 | 11 | |||
Development Potential (C11) | 0.259 | 0.047 | 12 | |||
Regional Economy (C12) | 0.204 | 0.037 | 16 | |||
Social and Cultural Values (B4) | 0.270 | Conformity with village history and culture (C13) | 0.227 | 0.061 | 8 | |
Participation in art intervention (C14) | 0.291 | 0.079 | 4 | |||
Number of art activities (C15) | 0.153 | 0.041 | 15 | |||
Improvement of Quality of Life (C16) | 0.329 | 0.089 | 1 |
