Table 3 Temporal activity overlap between selected competitor and predator–prey pairings at each management type using MWW test.

Species Pair	Land-Use Designation	∆₁	CI	W	Df	p value
Competitors
Margay & Ocelot	Core	0.729	0.55–0.89	1.979	2	0.372
	Buffer	0.686	0.42–0.91	2.641	2	0.267
	Private	0.568	0.29–0.81	3.435	2	0.180
Margay & Tayra	Core	0.109	0.004–0.24	39.495	2	<0.001
	Buffer	0.351	0.13–0.59	11.879	2	0.003
	Private	0.251	0.07–0.46	18.341	2	<0.001
Ocelot & Puma	Core	0.599	0.40–0.77	2.083	2	0.353
Ocelot & Puma	Buffer	0.672	0.49–0.84	5.209	2	0.074
Predator–Prey
Ocelot & Opossum	Core	0.453	0.27–0.64	17.454	2	<0.001
	Buffer	0.795	0.62–0.94	2.457	2	0.293
	Private	0.552	0.31–0.78	8.414	2	0.015
Ocelot & Armadillo	Core	0.427	0.21–0.65	10.026	2	0.006
	Buffer	0.719	0.50–0.90	2.693	2	0.260
	Private	0.518	0.25–0.77	5.947	2	0.051
Margay & Opossum	Core	0.629	0.46–0.79	11.729	2	0.003
	Buffer	0.681	0.44–0.89	3.90	2	0.143
	Private	0.529	0.30–0.76	9.80	2	0.007

Table includes Watson-Wheeler statistics (W), p values (p) associated with the MWW test, and the coefficient of overlap ‘Dhat1’ (∆₁) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Significant values are in bold.

Quick links

Search