Table 3 The experimental results of all algorithms on the considered test suite.

F₁

9.81\(\:\times\:\)10²

9.89\(\:\times\:\)10²

11.56\(\:\times\:\)10²

9.01\(\:\times\:\)10⁹

9.32\(\:\times\:\)10⁶

5.89\(\:\times\:\)10⁷

8.63\(\:\times\:\)10²

8.61\(\:\times\:\)10²

F₂

10.58\(\:\times\:\)10²

7.79\(\:\times\:\)10⁻¹

9.92\(\:\times\:\)10⁴

7.63\(\:\times\:\)10⁴

8.26\(\:\times\:\)10³

6.63\(\:\times\:\)10³

7.52\(\:\times\:\)10²

5.41\(\:\times\:\)10²

F₃

8.36\(\:\times\:\)10²

5.57\(\:\times\:\)10⁻¹

7.82\(\:\times\:\)10⁴

5.41\(\:\times\:\)10⁴

6.36\(\:\times\:\)10³

5.35\(\:\times\:\)10³

5.84\(\:\times\:\)10²

4.61\(\:\times\:\)10²

F₄

9.81\(\:\times\:\)10²

8.63\(\:\times\:\)10⁻¹

12.81\(\:\times\:\)10²

6.93\(\:\times\:\)10²

8.56\(\:\times\:\)10²

8.13\(\:\times\:\)10¹

6.23\(\:\times\:\)10²

4.23

F₅

9.81\(\:\times\:\)10²

8.25

10.35\(\:\times\:\)10²

7.23\(\:\times\:\)10¹

9.95\(\:\times\:\)10²

6.15\(\:\times\:\)10¹

8.36\(\:\times\:\)10²

5.23

F₆

10.22\(\:\times\:\)10²

8.23\(\:\times\:\)10⁻¹⁴

10.21\(\:\times\:\)10²

5.91\(\:\times\:\)10¹

10.63\(\:\times\:\)10²

5.56\(\:\times\:\)10¹

9.43\(\:\times\:\)10²

5.18\(\:\times\:\)10⁻¹

F₇

11.57\(\:\times\:\)10²

10.29\(\:\times\:\)10²

12.34\(\:\times\:\)10²

6.32\(\:\times\:\)10¹

11.84\(\:\times\:\)10²

5.96\(\:\times\:\)10¹

10.16\(\:\times\:\)10²

8.83

F₈

23.45\(\:\times\:\)10²

9.85

22.26\(\:\times\:\)10²

9.25\(\:\times\:\)10¹

20.14\(\:\times\:\)10²

10.83\(\:\times\:\)10¹

15.05\(\:\times\:\)10²

10.43

F₉

46.12\(\:\times\:\)10²

16.83

9.63\(\:\times\:\)10³

11.27\(\:\times\:\)10²

4.89\(\:\times\:\)10³

8.69\(\:\times\:\)10²

19.72\(\:\times\:\)10²

4.23

F₁₀

5.01\(\:\times\:\)10³

4.42

5.87\(\:\times\:\)10³

7.89\(\:\times\:\)10²

4.89\(\:\times\:\)10³

5.96\(\:\times\:\)10²

4.01\(\:\times\:\)10³

5.26\(\:\times\:\)10²