Table 13 The findings of the MO methods over helical coil spring challenge for automotive application.

From: An efficient multi-objective parrot optimizer for global and engineering optimization problems

Method

Challenge design objectives

Challenge design parameters

Volume(mm3)

Strain energy

d (mm)

D (mm)

Na

MOPSO

4.11E+07

2.27E+09

2.994

20.0

10.50

4.39E+07

2.19E+09

2.966

20.0

10.50

4.68E+07

2.12E+09

2.940

20.0

10.50

NSGA-II

1.50E+07

1.61E+10

4.302

20.7

16.00

1.50E+07

1.60E+10

4.273

20.9

16.00

1.51E+07

1.56E+10

4.244

20.9

15.95

MOGWO

2.24E+07

3.33E+09

3.306

20.0

10.50

2.62E+07

2.97E+09

3.210

20.0

10.50

2.88E+07

2.78E+09

3.159

20.0

10.50

MOWOA

1.48E+07

1.30E+10

4.192

20.0

16.00

1.48E+07

1.24E+10

4.143

20.0

16.00

1.49E+07

1.23E+10

4.136

20.0

15.98

MOSMA

1.50E+07

1.16E+10

4.156

20.0

15.99

1.48E+07

1.25E+10

4.147

20.0

15.98

1.50E+07

1.16E+10

4.100

20.0

15.55

IMOMRFO

1.50E+07

1.16E+10

4.089

20.0

15.69

1.56E+07

8.82E+09

3.939

20.0

13.87

1.59E+07

7.60E+09

3.849

20.0

13.11

MOGTO

2.24E+07

3.33E+09

3.306

20.0

10.50

2.62E+07

2.97E+09

3.210

20.0

10.50

2.88E+07

2.78E+09

3.159

20.0

10.50

MOPO

1.48E+07

1.25E+10

4.145

20.0

16.00

1.49E+07

1.22E+10

4.124

20.0

16.00

1.53E+07

1.11E+10

4.030

20.0

16.00