Table 18 Comparison matrix.

From: Circular intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators for multi-attribute decision-making

Methods

Score values

Ranking

Best ranking

Archimedean Heronia15

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.0981,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.5697,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.8045,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.8765\end{array}\right]\)

\(\left\{\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{4}>\\ Z{C}_{3}>\\ Z{C}_{2}>\\ Z{C}_{1}\end{array}\right\}\)

\(Z{C}_{4}\)

Fermatean43

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.0091,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.0707,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.0895,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.2134\end{array}\right]\)

\(\left\{\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{4}>\\ Z{C}_{3}>\\ Z{C}_{2}>\\ Z{C}_{1}\end{array}\right\}\)

\(Z{C}_{4}\)

Similarity16

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.0086,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.0127,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.1098,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.4523\end{array}\right]\)

\(\left\{\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{4}>\\ Z{C}_{3}>\\ Z{C}_{2}>\\ Z{C}_{1}\end{array}\right\}\)

\(Z{C}_{4}\)

Continuous22

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.1231,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.2378,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.3409,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.5645\end{array}\right]\)

\(\left\{\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{4}>\\ Z{C}_{3}>\\ Z{C}_{2}>\\ Z{C}_{1}\end{array}\right\}\)

\(ZC_{4}\)