Table 21 Results and discussion.

From: Circular intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators for multi-attribute decision-making

Methods

Score values

Best ranking

CIFHWA

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.0001,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.5046,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.5678,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.8045\end{array}\right]\)

\(Z{C}_{4}\)

CIFHOWA

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.0234,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.0987,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.1278,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.2987\end{array}\right]\)

\(Z{C}_{4}\)

CIFHHWA

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.0129,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.0934,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.1754,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.4098\end{array}\right]\)

\(Z{C}_{4}\)

CIFHWG

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.1019,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.2767,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.3976,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.6656\end{array}\right]\)

\(ZC_{4}\)

CIFHOWG

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.1291,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.2918,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.3909,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.6645\end{array}\right]\)

\(ZC_{4}\)

CIFHHWG

\(\left[\begin{array}{c}Z{C}_{1}=0.1098,\\ Z{C}_{2}=0.2027,\\ Z{C}_{3}=0.3765,\\ Z{C}_{4}=0.5987\end{array}\right]\)

\(ZC_{4}\)