Fig. 5 | Scientific Reports

Fig. 5

From: SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and associated risk factors in healthcare workers: systematic review and meta-analysis

Fig. 5The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Forest plot to evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 infection rates differed with infection prevention and control (IPC) training and performing aerosol-generating procedure among healthcare workers. (a) and (b) describes risk assessment following IPC training and performing aerosol-generating procedures respectively. Data are presented as odds ratios, ORs; and 95% confidence interval, CI. Meta-analysis of effect estimates was performed using the metabin function (meta22 package) in R version 4. 4.1. Pooling of studies was performed using Mantel–Haenszel method. Diamonds representing meta-analysis results are printed in green colour and squares representing individual study results are printed in pink colour. I2 is a statistic used in meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of total variance in effect sizes due to heterogeneity between studies.

Back to article page