Table 1 Comparison between group I and group II regarding demographic data.
From: Syntonic phototherapy versus part time occlusion for treatment of refractive amblyopia
Group I | Group II | Test value | P-value | Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. = 20 | No. = 20 | |||||
Age (years) | Mean ± SD | 10.70 ± 6.81 | 18.20 ± 11.41 | −2.578• | 0.010 | S |
Range | 6–37 | 7–45 | ||||
3–7 yrs | 7 (35.0%) | 3 (15.0%) | 8.800* | 0.012 | S | |
8–18 yrs | 12 (60.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | ||||
> 18 yrs | 1 (5.0%) | 9 (45.0%) | ||||
Sex | Male | 8 (40.0%) | 10 (50.0%) | 0.404* | 0.525 | NS |
Female | 12 (60.0%) | 10 (50.0%) | ||||
Laterality | Unilateral | 12 (60.0%) | 11 (55.0%) | 0.102* | 0.749 | NS |
Bilateral | 8 (40.0%) | 9 (45.0%) | ||||
Anterior segment examination | Normal | 20 (100.0%) | 20 (100.0%) | NA | NA | NA |
Fundus picture | Normal | 17 (85.0%) | 18 (90%) | 0.239* | 0.625 | NS |
Tigroid fundus | 3 (15.0%) | 2 (10%) | ||||
Cycloplegic refraction | ||||||
Sphere (D) | Mean ± SD | −1.05 ± 5.56 | −1.10 ± 4.51 | −0.122≠ | 0.903 | NS |
Range | −12–7 | −12–7 | ||||
Cylinder (D) | Mean ± SD | −1.66 ± 1.40 | −0.94 ± 3.04 | −0.194≠ | 0.846 | NS |
Range | −5–0.5 | −6.75–7 | ||||
Axis (°) | Mean ± SD | 83.60 ± 75.59 | 119.97 ± 63.29 | −1.162≠ | 0.245 | NS |
Range | 0–180 | 4–180 | ||||
