Table 4 Ablation study results (mean and 95% confidence interval (CI)). We investigated the impact of the choice of cardiac events and the incorporation of anatomical prior knowledge. (Seq.: Sequence).

From: AI-enabled diagnosis and localization of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery stenosis from magnetocardiographic recordings

QRS Seq.

TT Seq.

Fusion

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

F1

\(\checkmark\)

  

71.0 (66.6, 74.9)

77.9 (72.0, 82.8)

64.2 (57.9, 70.1)

68.0 (62.0, 73.3)

74.9 (68.4, 80.4)

72.6 (68.4, 76.4)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

 

75.3 (70.1, 79.8)

79.1 (74.9, 88.6)

70.5 (63.5, 76.6)

64.0 (56.1, 71.2)

82.6 (80.2, 91.1)

72.2 (66.5, 77.2)

 

\(\checkmark\)

 

83.6 (79.0, 87.4)

79.3 (71.1, 85.7)

86.3 (80.6, 90.6)

78.6 (70.4, 85.1)

86.8 (81.1, 84.6)

79.0 (73.3, 83.7)

 

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

85.8 (82.3, 88.7)

81.4 (75.8, 85.9)

90.1 (85.6, 93.3)

88.9 (83.9, 92.5)

83.3 (78.2, 87.4)

85.0 (81.3, 88.0)