Table 6 Logistic regression evaluating associations between patient characteristics and utilization of fertility preservation in cohort.
From: Prevalence and impact of fertility preservation among young women with breast cancer
Varible | Univariate models | multivariate models | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | |
Age at diagnosis (years) | ||||||
<30 vs. 30–40 | 13.17 | 6.61–26.23 | <0.01 | 4.55 | 1.76–11.75 | 0.002 |
Marital status | ||||||
Not vs. married | 31.13 | 10.11–95.78 | <0.01 | |||
Census Register | ||||||
Not vs. Agricultural Household | 4.81 | 2.33–9.90 | <0.01 | |||
Education level | ||||||
Bachelor’s degree or above vs. vocational education or below | 5.81 | 3.18–10.62 | <0.01 | 4.04 | 1.79–9.16 | 0.001 |
Household income | ||||||
More than ￥100,000 vs. not | 3.59 | 1.88–6.84 | <0.01 | |||
Occupation | ||||||
Not vs. agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery personnel | 10.77 | 3.79–30.60 | <0.01 | |||
Stage of diagnosis | ||||||
I vs. II + III | 2.76 | 1.52–5.02 | <0.01 | |||
Grade of pathological | ||||||
1 + 2 vs. 3 | 0.99 | 0.54–1.85 | 0.99 | |||
Hormone receptor status | ||||||
Triple negative vs. not | 0.55 | 0.27–1.17 | 0.12 | |||
Surgical method | ||||||
Breast-conserving surgery vs. not | 6.24 | 3.38–11.51 | <0.01 | |||
Chemotherapy | ||||||
Adjuvant vs. neoadjuvant | 0.72 | 0.39–1.33 | 0.29 | |||
Radiotherapy | ||||||
No vs. yes | 0.95 | 0.56–1.87 | 0.95 | |||
Prescribed hormone therapy | ||||||
No vs. yes | 1.47 | 0.81–2.67 | 0.21 | |||
Family history of breast cancer | ||||||
No vs. yes | 0.83 | 0.17–4.09 | 0.81 | |||
Pregnancy/births | ||||||
Never delivered or delivered one child vs. delivered two or more child | 0.03 | 0.01–0.08 | <0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02–0.18 | <0.01 |
