Table 3 Comparison of performance in 5 locations.
Case | Energy consumption per square meter | Electricity output | Electricity consumption rate for thermal comfort | Electricity supply rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
kWh/m2 | kWh | – | – | |
Tianjin | 207.99 | 1185.56 | 46.87% | 116.33% |
Xining | 242.38 | 1269.25 | 57.16% | 106.87% |
Nanning | 123.39 | 1112.01 | 12.85% | 183.92% |
Hangzhou | 133.80 | 998.28 | 19.33% | 152.26% |
Lhasa | 143.52 | 1534.04 | 15.77% | 218.13% |