Table 5 Numerical results for test Case III.
Domain | Modeling method | Average relative RMS error | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NB = 50 | NB = 100 | NB = 200 | NB = 400 | NB = 800 | NB = 1600 | ||
Original (X) | Kriging | 63.6% | 53.8% | 45.2% | 40.0% | 35.1% | 32.3% |
RBF | 68.9% | 55.2% | 43.9% | 40.8% | 37.2% | 34.7% | |
GPR | 70.2% | 69.1% | 56.4% | 47.9% | 42.3% | 70.2% | |
SVR | 79.6% | 72.6% | 68.4% | 63.2% | 61.0% | 59.6% | |
ANN 1 | 78.3% | 77.4% | 65.2% | 59.4% | 37.2% | 33.3% | |
ANN 2 | 82.2% | 78.3% | 66.2% | 61.2% | 49.8% | 42.3% | |
ANN 3 | 79.3% | 77.8% | 64.8% | 59.7% | 45.5% | 44.1% | |
RNN-LSTM (this work) | 75.3% | 55.6% | 37.8% | 26.8% | 17.8% | 16.3% | |
Reduced (Xd) | Kriging | 38.9% | 28.7% | 23.5% | 16.6% | 12.5% | 8.4% |
RBF | 42.5% | 31.3% | 26.0% | 18.1% | 14.1% | 9.9% | |
GPR | 60.7% | 51.8% | 41.1% | 41.1% | 33.7% | 25.8% | |
SVR | 55.5% | 51.9% | 47.7% | 44.0% | 39.1% | 37.2% | |
ANN 1 | 52.4% | 34.0% | 23.2% | 16.8% | 12.0% | 10.0% | |
ANN 2 | 47.5% | 35.7% | 24.6% | 19.5% | 14.6% | 11.1% | |
ANN 3 | 48.7% | 36.2% | 25.1% | 18.7% | 15.1% | 11.4% | |
RNN-LSTM (this work) | 50.7% | 29.3% | 18.8% | 11.9% | 7.6% | 5.6% | |