Table 1 Judgment matrix scaling and its interpretation.
From: LCD-AHP-TRIZ methodology enhances low-carbon principles in smart product design
9-level scale | Interpretation (comparing the importance of evaluation indicators with \(\:r_{i}\)vs. \(\:{r}_{j}\:\)) |
|---|---|
1 | Evaluation indicator \(\:{r}_{i}\) is as important as\(\:\:{r}_{j}\) |
3 | Evaluation indicator \(\:{r}_{i}\) is slightly more important than \(\:{r}_{j}\) |
5 | Evaluating Indicators \(\:{r}_{i}\) and \(\:{r}_{j}\) is significantly important |
7 | Evaluation metrics \(\:{r}_{i}\) and\(\:{r}_{j}\) are strongly important |
9 | Evaluation metrics \(\:{r}_{i}\) and \(\:{r}_{j}\) are extremely important |
2,4,6,8 | Median value of upper neighboring scales |
reciprocal | When the evaluation indicator \(\:{r}_{i}\) is compared with\(\:{r}_{j}\), its judgment value is \(\:{\:\:C}_{JI}=\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/\:\!\raisebox{-1ex}{${\:\:C}_{IJ}$}\right.\:,{\:\:C}_{JI}=1\) |