Fig. 4
From: Vaginal microbiota transplantation alleviates vaginal atrophy in ovariectomized mice
Compositional analysis and functional prediction of VM in different groups of mice. (A) UPGMA cluster analysis based on Unifrac weighted distance matrix. (B) Gammaproteobacteria (one-way ANOVA, F4, 25 = 12.35, P < 0.001). (C) Bacilli (one-way ANOVA, F4, 25 = 7.774, P = 0.0003). (D) Clostridia (one-way ANOVA, F4, 25 = 11.56, P < 0.0001). (E) Actinobacteria (one-way ANOVA, F4, 25 = 13.88, P < 0.001). (F) Bacteroidia (one-way ANOVA, F4, 25 = 3.028, P = 0.0364). (G) Differences in VM between groups at the genus level STAMP. (H) Relative abundance bar chart displaying COG function for each sample. (I) COG function differences be-tween groups: function unknown (one-way ANOVA, F4, 25 = 8.954, P < 0.0001). (J) COG function differences between groups: cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning (one-way ANOVA, F4, 25 = 11.05, P < 0.0001). (B–F) The five most abundant species in each group of VM at the phylum level. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. ANOVA: analysis of variance. Only differences with P value less than 0.05 are shown.
