Table 3 Summary of performance parameters of 4T tandem solar cell calculated using SCAPS and TMM simulation.
Device architecture | Electron affinity χ (eV) | VOC (V) | JSC (mA cm−2) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITO/Cu2O/FA0.8Cs0.2Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 (Eg ~ 1.77 eV) (350 nm)/C60/SnO2 /ITO/Au | Front cell- AM1.5G spectra | 2.86 | 1.25 | 15.65 | 84.26 | 16.58 |
3.80 | 1.27 | 15.71 | 85.42 | 17.11 | ||
ITO/PEDOT: PSS/ FA0.7MA0.3Pb0.5Sn0.5I3 (Eg ~ 1.22 eV) /C60/SnO2/Cu | Back cell-filtered spectra | – | 0.82 | 15.28 | 80.21 | 18.40 |
4T tandem device (Cu2O-HTL) | Mechanically stacked | 2.86 | – | – | – | 34.98 |
3.80 | – | – | – | 35.51 | ||
ITO/Cu–O/FA0.8Cs0.2Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 (Eg ~ 1.77 eV) (350 nm)/C60/SnO2 /ITO/Au | Front cell- AM1.5G spectra | 2.84 | 0.89 | 15.80 | 77.40 | 10.91 |
3.80 | 1.27 | 15.88 | 85.55 | 17.31 | ||
ITO/PEDOT: PSS/ FA0.7MA0.3Pb0.5Sn0.5I3 (Eg ~ 1.22 eV) /C60/SnO2/Cu | Back cell-Filtered spectra | – | 0.85 | 32.19 | 79.62 | 21.85 |
4T tandem device (Cu–O-HTL) | Mechanically stacked | 2.84 | – | – | 32.76 | |
3.80 | – | – | – | 39.16 | ||