Table 5 Ablation study of the proposed GE-Net, LA-Net, and IE Gate (%).

From: Adaptive feature interaction enhancement network for text classification

Model name

Group

GE

FLA

Gate

F1

TextCNN

Group A

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

97.55

A1

\(\checkmark\)

91.03

A2

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

-

90.81

DPCNN

Group B

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

93.62

B1

\(\checkmark\)

91.12

B2

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

90.97

LSTM (3)

Group C

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

91.56

C1

\(\checkmark\)

91.00

C2

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

90.69

Transformer

Group D

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

90.01

D1

\(\checkmark\)

89.74

D2

\(\checkmark\)

\(\checkmark\)

89.80

  1. In the ablation experiment with "Model name" as a group, the result with the optimal performance in this group is emphasized in bold.