Table 3 Importance index and ranking.
From: An investigation study on residential buildings for cost overrun
S. No. | Category influence Costoverrun | Identity of factors | FI | SI | II | Ranking based on Importance Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Periodic Design Changes | F1 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.49 | 5 |
2 | Non-timely payment from Client to contractor | F2 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.41 | 9 |
3 | Inadequate Skilled Labour | F3 | 0.82 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 3 |
4 | Inadequate supervision | F4 | 0.76 | 0.50 | 0.38 | 10 |
5 | Non-coordination of Contractor and Designer | F5 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.47 | 6 |
6 | Lack of Inspection by Designer | F6 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.46 | 7 |
7 | Climatic variation on exceution of project | F7 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.37 | 11 |
8 | Hike in Materials Cost | F8 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.29 | 12 |
9 | Overall lag in schedule of work | F9 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 1 |
10 | Rework/Extra work in Unforeseen situation | F10 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 2 |
11 | Inadequate design and specification | F11 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 4 |
12 | Lack of Labour Performance | F12 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.46 | 8 |
