Table 3 Results of the linear model predicting state anxiety by condition category, phase category, and their interaction while correcting for baseline anxiety (N = 120).

From: A proof of concept study on digital interventions for reducing socio-evaluative stress and anxiety in youth

 

Estimate

Std. error

df

t value

p value

Condition category

 Attention training

− 0.158

0.591

321

− 0.268

.789

 Detached mindfulness

− 0.073

0.593

319

− 0.123

.902

 Slow breathing

− 1.078

0.591

321

− 1.825

.069

Phase category

 Post-intervention

0.333

0.432

480

0.772

.440

 Anticipation

− 0.867

0.432

480

− 2.007

.045*

 Speech

0.767

0.432

480

1.776

.076

 Recovery

1.600

0.432

480

3.706

< .001***

Baseline scores

0.582

0.068

120

8.533

< .001***

Interactions

 Attention training*post-intervention

0.967

0.611

480

1.583

.114

 Detached mindfulness*post-intervention

0.767

0.611

480

1.256

.210

 Slow breathing*post-intervention

2.267

0.611

480

3.712

< .001***

 Attention training*anticipation

0.433

0.611

480

0.710

.478

 Detached mindfulness*anticipation

− 1.000

0.611

480

− 1.638

.102

 Slow breathing*anticipation

0.400

0.611

480

0.655

.513

 Attention training*speech

0.233

0.611

480

0.382

.703

 Detached mindfulness*speech

− 1.100

0.611

480

− 1.802

.072

 Slow breathing*speech

− 0.167

0.611

480

− 0.273

.785

 Attention training*recovery

0.767

0.611

480

1.256

.210

 Detached mindfulness*recovery

0.067

0.611

480

0.109

.913

 Slow breathing*recovery

0.667

0.611

480

1.092

.275

  1. The control condition and the anticipation phase are the reference categories.
  2. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.